Squirt I really don't mind been told to FUCK OFF and really I''d love too BUT you see your President is supposed to be THE LEADER OF THE FREE WORLD. I am part of that world and as part of that world I see "OUR LEADER" as a threat to that world, and I as every other FREE THINKER should protest their displeasure as often as they can in the interest of world peace and the rights of all fellow humans. The leader of the FREE WORLD is a monkey about to attempt brain surgery, he is proving it over and over.. I am sick of quoting facts as they seem beyond you, you simply recall fabricated history. Your mind is a bear trap, limited by your beliefs and a lack of imagination. You see I don't give a crap about democrats or republicans I care about what I am looking at, and I see a pile of steaming shit!! The Thump Administration!!

Spert, saying f off to a person even if they are, or aren't behind a computer's monitor, and in person isn't the solution because of you possibly having the feeling of being provoked. I said about the type of swearing, too. Right now, I might be at the point of sending this thread six feet under, with how it's turned out. I'm not just saying that, and implying any threats whatsoever. I haven't done any types of threats, too. This thread does look, and sounds like it's turned into a circus, or freak show. If there are anymore of what has been done, and posted like that, again, then I will do it.


Don't worry about it Derek, it is just a passionate reponse, it's only offensive if one cares, this one does not care ... chill Bud all is OKAY! U r a good and responsible person..

Amazing that I have to keep explaining what i really was saying because some people just DON'T GET IT. There are zero contradictions in anything I said. And you know it. I said, for the thousandth time, that illegals according to the law, CAN NOT VOTE and are not supposed to. But they do anyway. You've never heard about a criminal breaking the law even though he knows what he's doing is against the law? You've never heard of that? And the illegals did vote this last time, I would place money on it. I haven't contradicted myself at all.
You actually believe the kooks in the media that say (even though they have no proof and never did) that Trump's team was in contact with Russia and that's the biggest reason Trump won. You know that the media will say ANYTHING and believe ANYTHING and get others to believe their BS if it will make Trump look bad. If it might make Trump look good, they won't say anything about it. You know exactly where their bias and prejudice lies. The media's been this way since at least the 1980s, and probably longer than that. You can't listen to and believe EVERYTHING the media says. Especially in today's world, where we have George Soroses giving billions of his own money to buy and pay off "protestors" just to make it look like 90 percent of America hates Trump. Ninety percent do NOT HATE him.
In fact a recent poll had Trump's approval at 55 percent, and the media did NOT dispute that at the press conference yesterday.
Don't take what I say and TWIST it, yes that IS what you have done. I didnt' say illegals have NEVER voted. I said they are NOT SUPPOSED TO but they do. There is no contradiction.
And no, it has not been proven the Russians were working with the Trump campaign, you just want to believe it. Trump won legitimately and you know it.
What I said about the GOP only controlling all of the government vs the Democrats controlling it was completely true. The Democrats HAVE controlled government for a LOT longer than the GOP has over the years, and the Dems hate that they are NOT in control now. That is the POINT i was making. They have had complete control for so long they hate even the thought of losing control even for a little while. Their attitude is, If the American people do NOT give us total control, they are incredibly stupid. It is our BIRTHRIGHT to control everything and get what we want. And they have felt that way for a very long time now. This business of 1953 and 1954 is BESIDE THE POINT. That is TWO YEARS, whereas the Democrats had complete control for more than 20 YEARS since the 20s. Even when a Republican was in the White House, the Democrats had control of one or BOTH houses of Congress. It's the power they don't want to lose. What I just stated are facts, not my theory.
Kert, I said that the president (not me) would tell you to F off. He's gonna do what he's gonna do and has been elected to do. Yes he IS the leader of the free world, and we haven't had a true leader of the free world for eight years. Now we do. We are not going to be kissing our enemy's asses. He doesn't go around the world apologizing for the existence of the US, he doesn't go around saying he is ashamed of this nation. We had enough of that BS for eight years. NO facts are beyond me, but they certainly seem to be beyond you.
Derek, when the ONLY person you MENTION in your post is ME, WTF am I supposed to think? maybe you should tell some others to STFU because THEY are being a little rude and arrogant. Ever thought of that?

Sex-spert you are just hopeless. you have the mental capacity of a walnut. (I may even be giving you credit on that one) YOU were the one that made up the FACT saying it could not be proven false. Well I proved it false and now you are saying it does not matter, well you said it was TRUE but in fact you LIED, and MADE up 'FACTS' to try and justify it even after it was proven wrong by trying to say you were 'TECHNICALLY' right (because of a LIE) then you were again PROVEN wrong. The main contradiction in your post is between what you say and the real world. You want to believe in what you want to even when the truth is put in front of your face. I have proven you you are full of shit and crying about that is not what you meant just means you are a cry baby and full of shit. Oh and sex-spert I am talking about YOU.

Amazing that I have to keep explaining what i really was saying because some people just DON'T GET IT. There are zero contradictions in anything I said. And you know it. I said, for the thousandth time, that illegals according to the law, CAN NOT VOTE and are not supposed to. But they do anyway. You've never heard about a criminal breaking the law even though he knows what he's doing is against the law? You've never heard of that? And the illegals did vote this last time, I would place money on it. I haven't contradicted myself at all.
You actually believe the kooks in the media that say (even though they have no proof and never did) that Trump's team was in contact with Russia and that's the biggest reason Trump won. You know that the media will say ANYTHING and believe ANYTHING and get others to believe their BS if it will make Trump look bad. If it might make Trump look good, they won't say anything about it. You know exactly where their bias and prejudice lies. The media's been this way since at least the 1980s, and probably longer than that. You can't listen to and believe EVERYTHING the media says. Especially in today's world, where we have George Soroses giving billions of his own money to buy and pay off "protestors" just to make it look like 90 percent of America hates Trump. Ninety percent do NOT HATE him.
In fact a recent poll had Trump's approval at 55 percent, and the media did NOT dispute that at the press conference yesterday.
Don't take what I say and TWIST it, yes that IS what you have done. I didnt' say illegals have NEVER voted. I said they are NOT SUPPOSED TO but they do. There is no contradiction.
And no, it has not been proven the Russians were working with the Trump campaign, you just want to believe it. Trump won legitimately and you know it.
What I said about the GOP only controlling all of the government vs the Democrats controlling it was completely true. The Democrats HAVE controlled government for a LOT longer than the GOP has over the years, and the Dems hate that they are NOT in control now. That is the POINT i was making. They have had complete control for so long they hate even the thought of losing control even for a little while. Their attitude is, If the American people do NOT give us total control, they are incredibly stupid. It is our BIRTHRIGHT to control everything and get what we want. And they have felt that way for a very long time now. This business of 1953 and 1954 is BESIDE THE POINT. That is TWO YEARS, whereas the Democrats had complete control for more than 20 YEARS since the 20s. Even when a Republican was in the White House, the Democrats had control of one or BOTH houses of Congress. It's the power they don't want to lose. What I just stated are facts, not my theory.
Kert, I said that the president (not me) would tell you to F off. He's gonna do what he's gonna do and has been elected to do. Yes he IS the leader of the free world, and we haven't had a true leader of the free world for eight years. Now we do. We are not going to be kissing our enemy's asses. He doesn't go around the world apologizing for the existence of the US, he doesn't go around saying he is ashamed of this nation. We had enough of that BS for eight years. NO facts are beyond me, but they certainly seem to be beyond you.
Derek, when the ONLY person you MENTION in your post is ME, WTF am I supposed to think? maybe you should tell some others to STFU because THEY are being a little rude and arrogant. Ever thought of that?



Why shouldn't I believe in media ? Or why should I only believe in media who writes positive to Trump ?
What is the criteria that makes statements true and what makes them false ?
You take for example the rasmussen reports as proof for poopularity of trump.
Their data is collected via telephone surveys of 500 likely voters per night and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. ( http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_feb17 ) They announce a total approvement of 55% for Trump. It's the highest poll for Trump.
On the other end there is the GALLUP POLL with 38% APPROVAL for Trump (56% diaproval) who asks 1500 people daily ( http://www.gallup.com/poll/201617/gallup-daily-trump-job-approval.aspx ).
What makes them a lying media and Rasmussen a true media especially as PEW is nearby gallup ?
( http://www.westernjournalism.com/two-polls-on-president-trumps-approval-rating-two-vastly-different- results/ )

Btw .. the majority of the polls is below 50% approval for Trump - according to you there is only one telling the truth. Thats the kind of Trump democraty - everything he does and says is the good thing - all others have to shut up. Who wants an interview has to write how great Thump is - otherwise he won't answer.
That is not democraty in it's definition - it's the way that despots chose to make themself shine bright.

Even if I am different opinion in global warming as you I appreciate that you added links to substantiate your opinion.
At least I know now where your sources are from - even if I still consider them wrong - I can't say now that they are totally built up in your fantasy.

Later that year Mrs Figueres ( your quote is from feb 2015 - following one is oct 2015) Ms Figueres said that it will be impossible to achieve a global warming of less than 2% until 2100 - with keeping ALL pledges without it will be more than 5%.
That doesn't mean we have no global warming - and it does neither say efforts are worthless. Every single action helps - even if it is only a small contribution it is A CONTRIBUTION. ( https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/oct/30/worlds-climate-pledges-likely-to-lead-to-less-th an-3c-of-warming-un )

And - as I love data which is based on physical units - here a link for global CO2 / Temperature graph which helps me in building an own opinion:
http://www.climatecentral.org/gallery/graphics/co2-and-rising-global- it shows that since the 1970 the temperature is on a higher rise as before - some does CO2 emission. We have just one world - and that world is worth every single small affford.
Don't tell me now it's a wrong graph as CO2 emission isn't in Fahrenheit and that makes the graph spread different as it is in reality. Mr Trump tries to sell that to you.


... NO facts are beyond me ...

That I can confirm that there are NO facts beyond you .. at least mostly

wow alb you actually read his (Sex-spert) post, you are better then I am I cannot usually get past the first couple of lies er I mean lines.

Squirt Statement: "He doesn't go around the world apologizing for the existence of the US, he doesn't go around saying he is ashamed of this nation."

Please site an American President that did this, with an ACTUAL case of him doing so, with EXACT words used and to WHOM it was said ... PLEASE! or is this just another alternative FACT?! Lets weed your FICTION from actual FACT.

Squirt Statement: "In fact a recent poll had Trump's approval at 55 percent, and the media did NOT dispute that at the press conference yesterday. "

Name the pole and quote your source ... or is this just another alternative FACT?! Lets weed your FICTION from actual FACT.

Squirt Statement: "He doesn't go around the world apologizing for the existence of the US, he doesn't go around saying he is ashamed of this nation."

Please site an American President that did this, with an ACTUAL case of him doing so, with EXACT words used and to WHOM it was said ... PLEASE! or is this just another alternative FACT?! Lets weed your FICTION from actual FACT.


LOL the site link really adds some color to your comment. love it. Now those are alternative fact I could favorite.

LOL the site link really adds some color to your comment. love it. Now those are alternative fact I could favorite.





Those are great FACTS

LOL the site link really adds some color to your comment. love it. Now those are alternative fact I could favorite.





Wow first time I've seen alternative Models ... this is one brainy site huh?

Squirt Statement: "He doesn't go around the world apologizing for the existence of the US, he doesn't go around saying he is ashamed of this nation."

Please site an American President that did this, with an ACTUAL case of him doing so, with EXACT words used and to WHOM it was said ... PLEASE! or is this just another alternative FACT?! Lets weed your FICTION from actual FACT.

Squirt Statement: "In fact a recent poll had Trump's approval at 55 percent, and the media did NOT dispute that at the press conference yesterday. "

Name the poll and quote your source ... or is this just another alternative FACT?! Lets weed your FICTION from actual FACT.



He did - it was Rasmussen poll - who asked 500 likely voters - with an result of 55% pro Trump. It's Donalds favorite poll.
On the other hand there is Gallup poll (asking 1500 people daily) which actually goes down below 35% pro Trump.

Trump will call them liars - as he is not able to take criticism. Trump plays with populism - everything not as his favor is directly declared as lie and all other positive things are based on his affords. Thats how he attracts elder (50+) people most with low gradution according to ( PEW research http://www.westernjournalism.com/two-polls-on-president-trumps-approval-rating-two-vastly-different- results/ ).

Spurt will declare PEW research as faked news again, as Donald does too - thats how we know both

He did - it was Rasmussen poll - who asked 500 likely voters - with an result of 55% pro Trump. It's Donalds favorite poll.
On the other hand there is Gallup poll (asking 1500 people daily) which actually goes down below 35% pro Trump.

Trump will call them liars - as he is not able to take criticism. Trump plays with populism - everything not as his favor is directly declared as lie and all other positive things a based on his affords. Thats how he attracts elder (50+) most with low gradution according to PEW research ( http://www.westernjournalism.com/two-polls-on-president-trumps-approval-rating-two-vastly-different- results/ ).

Spurt will declare PEW research as faked news again, as Donald does too - thats how we know both


Rasmussen poll? Thats a poll? 500, thats not a sample, its a joke ...

alb you missed two important items about the poll sex-spert quoted.

1. It is not a poll of all Americans it is a poll of likely voters. That means if a person is not considered likely to vote their opinion is removed from the data set. Most other pollsters use a poll of all adults for this question.
2. (and this is the worst part) Rasmussen Reports (for this poll) uses an online survey tool to interview randomly selected participants from a demographically diverse panel. Most reliable pollsters will not use an on-line survey as they are very easy to skew, because their "demographically diverse panel" never is.

So to use this poll as representative of all Americans is an invalid use as it is it filtered to likely voters. Also the on line survey raises a lot of doubts to its validity. Also according to wiki "Rasmussen Reports polls have consistently ranked as the most favorable poll in President Obama's favorability rating."1 So it could be said their process produces a more favorable rating for the president, then a poll of all Americans.

Info about rasmussen reports polling collection for this poll was found at (and paraphrased from):
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_feb1 7
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports

alb you missed two important items about the poll sex-spert quoted.

1. It is not a poll of all Americans it is a poll of likely voters. That means if a person is not considered likely to vote their opinion is removed from the data set. Most other pollsters use a poll of all adults for this question.
2. (and this is the worst part) Rasmussen Reports (for this poll) uses an online survey tool to interview randomly selected participants from a demographically diverse panel. Most reliable pollsters will not use an on-line survey as they are very easy to skew, because their "demographically diverse panel" never is.

So to use this poll as representative of all Americans is an invalid use as it is it filtered to likely voters. Also the on line survey raises a lot of doubts to its validity. Also according to wiki "Rasmussen Reports polls have consistently ranked as the most favorable poll in President Obama's favorability rating."1 So it could be said their process produces a more favorable rating for the president, then a poll of all Americans.

Info about rasmussen reports polling collection for this poll was found at (and paraphrased from):
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/trump_administration/prez_track_feb1 7
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rasmussen_Reports

Arch - I didn't miss it - I just forgot to write LIKELY VOTERS in capital letters - but none the less am curious about our comedians answer. How he defends Rasmussen - how he discredits PEW and GALLUP - and am curious about how to find out which survey is true and which one is polemics.
I just continued and g00gled some sites who gave an average of several polls - the average of them is around 42 % approval for Trump ( without Rasmussen it would even be less as they were the only above 50%; source: RealClearPolitics ) - so am a bit happy that the majority of Americans(in Spurts words it is even the waste majority ) still praises western values - and knows the meaning of democracy.

Arch - I didn't miss it - I just forgot to write LIKELY VOTERS in capital letters - but none the less am curious about our comedians answer. How he defends Rasmussen - how he discredits PEW and GALLUP - and am curious about how to find out which survey is true and which one is polemics.
I just continued and g00gled some sites who gave an average of several polls - the average of them is around 42 % approval for Trump ( without Rasmussen it would even be less as they were the only above 50%; source: RealClearPolitics ) - so am a bit happy that the majority of Americans(in Spurts words it is even the waste majority ) still praises western values - and knows the meaning of democracy.


I am guessing he will cry a lot saying it does not matter that the facts he quoted turned out to be false (he may even try and make up new 'FACTS' to say he was TECHNICALLY "right" though.) He will then claim his point is still correct even though he has no FACTS to validate its accuracy. And yes the CAPITAL LETTERS are important it make your 'FACTS' 12% more true then they would be in lower case (OK I made that up but you already knew that). Also with out upper case I would not know you can link categories here like alternative FACTS. (The place to be to see your alternative choices of FACTS (Well lovely ladies) but they are much nicer to look at then a sex-spert post.

Arch you are just pathetic and hopeless. There was nothing in my post that was a LIE and you know it. It was a FACT that I stated when I said the Democrats have had more power for a longer period of time than the GOP. You just deny the facts which is typical. The Democrats had control of Congress during the Eisenhower administration, all the years of the Nixon administration, the Ford administration, the H.W. Bush administration, and two years of the George W. Bush administration. ALL Republican presidents. I am stating the FACTS here, not LIES, but you will still call them lies even though the truth of history does not change. For over 20 years (since I have to state this again because you NEVER listen) Democrats had control of ALL of Congress AND the White House. I didn't make that up and you know it. The Democrats don't want to lose their power and they get angry if they do lose it. That's the point i was making which you ignore. And another fact I will add.....The Democrats had control of state houses and states senates, governorships and the majority of governorships and other political state positions for a sustained period of time ever since the 1950s. That did not start to change until 2010. These are FACTS, but you're still going to call them lies just because I am saying this. So whiny cry baby full of shit Arch, you can't handle the truth of my statements.
My theory as to why the voters started electing the GOP to state houses and governorships in 2010 was because they were seeing everything that Obama was doing, his attitude and his dictatorial actions, and it was disgusting to them. So they started to elect the GOP in their states to counter the Obama administration, which is a smart move. Today, there are only FIVE states that have total Democratic control. And I'm sure the Democrats hate losing control at the state level as well, not just the federal level. They live and die by power and control, and if they lose it, they will throw their temper tantrums just like they have done in the Senate against Trump's nominees.
TY for saying, ALb, that you can't say that what I say is built up in my fantasy. Because, it isn't. Arch would completely disagree with you there and STILL call me a liar even though the facts are staring right in his face. I will put up other links in the future to support other things I comment upon.
As far as polling goes. Do you know how many times the newspapers and media claimed that LINCOLN'S approval rating was 10 percent at best? It seemed like EVERYONE was critical of him. It's common knowledge today that Lincoln was one of the greatest American Presidents that we ever had. No one can deny that, although Arch would. If Lincoln would have gone by polls all the time, he would have put a bullet into his OWN brain. You can't trust polls all the time, especially not polls conducted by the current media in this country. History will prove, just as it did for Lincoln himself, that Trump did fantastic, wonderful things for our nation, no matter WHAT certain polls may claim.
Also, Trump just drew a HUGE crowd once again, speaking in Florida. The groundswell of his support is out there and it's STILL strong and unwavering.
Kert, you must have been BLIND for eight years. The one that went around the world apologizing for the very existence of the United States and was ashamed of our nation was NOT a president. He was a dictator by the name of Obama. So it is true, no president did that, but America's first dictator, Obama, DID do that. It is refreshing to have a guy in the Oval Office now who will NOT ever do that.
As a side note, Rasmussen has tended to be correct in predicting which presidential candidate will WIN in elections. So don't count them out completely. Again I state, though, that Trump should not decide how he's going to feel or what he's going to do based on ANY given poll. He should just charge full speed ahead and do what he was elected to do. And he has been doing that.

Arch you are just pathetic and hopeless. There was nothing in my post that was a LIE and you know it. It was a FACT that I stated when I said the Democrats have had more power for a longer period of time than the GOP. You just deny the facts which is typical. The Democrats had control of Congress during the Eisenhower administration, all the years of the Nixon administration, the Ford administration, the H.W. Bush administration, and two years of the George W. Bush administration. ALL Republican presidents. I am stating the FACTS here, not LIES, but you will still call them lies even though the truth of history does not change. For over 20 years (since I have to state this again because you NEVER listen) Democrats had control of ALL of Congress AND the White House. I didn't make that up and you know it. The Democrats don't want to lose their power and they get angry if they do lose it. That's the point i was making which you ignore. And another fact I will add.....The Democrats had control of state houses and states senates, governorships and the majority of governorships and other political state positions for a sustained period of time ever since the 1950s. That did not start to change until 2010. These are FACTS, but you're still going to call them lies just because I am saying this. So whiny cry baby full of shit Arch, you can't handle the truth of my statements.
My theory as to why the voters started electing the GOP to state houses and governorships in 2010 was because they were seeing everything that Obama was doing, his attitude and his dictatorial actions, and it was disgusting to them. So they started to elect the GOP in their states to counter the Obama administration, which is a smart move. Today, there are only FIVE states that have total Democratic control. And I'm sure the Democrats hate losing control at the state level as well, not just the federal level. They live and die by power and control, and if they lose it, they will throw their temper tantrums just like they have done in the Senate against Trump's nominees.
TY for saying, ALb, that you can't say that what I say is built up in my fantasy. Because, it isn't. Arch would completely disagree with you there and STILL call me a liar even though the facts are staring right in his face. I will put up other links in the future to support other things I comment upon.
As far as polling goes. Do you know how many times the newspapers and media claimed that LINCOLN'S approval rating was 10 percent at best? It seemed like EVERYONE was critical of him. It's common knowledge today that Lincoln was one of the greatest American Presidents that we ever had. No one can deny that, although Arch would. If Lincoln would have gone by polls all the time, he would have put a bullet into his OWN brain. You can't trust polls all the time, especially not polls conducted by the current media in this country. History will prove, just as it did for Lincoln himself, that Trump did fantastic, wonderful things for our nation, no matter WHAT certain polls may claim.
Also, Trump just drew a HUGE crowd once again, speaking in Florida. The groundswell of his support is out there and it's STILL strong and unwavering.
Kert, you must have been BLIND for eight years. The one that went around the world apologizing for the very existence of the United States and was ashamed of our nation was NOT a president. He was a dictator by the name of Obama. So it is true, no president did that, but America's first dictator, Obama, DID do that. It is refreshing to have a guy in the Oval Office now who will NOT ever do that.
As a side note, Rasmussen has tended to be correct in predicting which presidential candidate will WIN in elections. So don't count them out completely. Again I state, though, that Trump should not decide how he's going to feel or what he's going to do based on ANY given poll. He should just charge full speed ahead and do what he was elected to do. And he has been doing that.




It wasn't facts you quoted - you quoted the FACT that SOMEONE wrote Ms Figueres told that global warming isn't existing. That doesn't make it a fact that there is NO global warming.

BTW .. what did Trump smoke to justify his alien ban with an assault that never happend ?
Is Sweden Terror act the sequal of Green Bowling Massacre ?
Spreading fear with untrue statements - and after declaring news that point out it isn't true- thats EXACTLY how Trump got his fans and supporters.
Twisting facts - creating new fantasies and declaring them a truth - everybody who doesn't confirm him or is against Trump is a moslem and a TRUE enemy of the american people.
It's the way dictatorships start. Never ever in history a President played that much with fear and lies as Trump does.

A praise to John McCain for pointing out that news are IMPORTANT for a democracy
I hope Reps will remember their responsibility for the people and stop the nonsens Trump starts - McCain did a first small step by stating an opinion different to Trumps.

I still hope it won't take too long and you will open your eyes and see what mess you created by making a man full of narcism and egoism who always acts only for his own profit your President.
And hopefully AMERICA remembers the values they claim to have and live them again.
At the moment they don't

Do you know how many times the newspapers and media claimed that LINCOLN'S approval rating was 10 percent at best? It seemed like EVERYONE was critical of him. It's common knowledge today that Lincoln was one of the greatest American Presidents that we ever had. No one can deny that, although Arch would. If Lincoln would have gone by polls all the time, he would have put a bullet into his OWN brain. You can't trust polls all the time, especially not polls conducted by the current media in this country. History will prove, just as it did for Lincoln himself, that Trump did fantastic, wonderful things for our nation, no matter WHAT certain polls may claim.

Ok polls be damned, you did not just try to compare Trump to Lincoln, right? They stand for two totally opposite views, you see that right? Lincoln ended slavery and stood for equality among those of different color, Trump is building a wall to keep out Mexicans and banning Muslims and people from middle eastern countries as a scare tactic. There is no worse comparison you could have made among the past POTUS's. I know you were talking about poll BS but still, the HUGE difference in what they stood for kinda invalidates your connection about their approval ratings. Not the same.


Kert, you must have been BLIND for eight years. The one that went around the world apologizing for the very existence of the United States and was ashamed of our nation was NOT a president. He was a dictator by the name of Obama. So it is true, no president did that, but America's first dictator, Obama, DID do that. It is refreshing to have a guy in the Oval Office now who will NOT ever do that.
As a side note, Rasmussen has tended to be correct in predicting which presidential candidate will WIN in elections. So don't count them out completely. Again I state, though, that Trump should not decide how he's going to feel or what he's going to do based on ANY given poll. He should just charge full speed ahead and do what he was elected to do. And he has been doing that.


So you said you were going to start posting links to back up your statements, where is the one showing when Obama apologized to ANYONE for the existence of the US? He was no more a dictator than any other President.

You can't say that Obama issuing executive orders makes him a dictator, but when Trump does it its ok because he was "undoing what Obama did" except he is doing more than that. Think of it this way, you can't condemn Obama for splashing people in a pool then give Trump a Popsicle when he does it and tell him its ok just because Obama did it first.
Try to think of things a bit out of your little box of republicans and democrats, liberals and conservatives, not everything is so black and white.

lso, Trump just drew a HUGE crowd once again, speaking in Florida. The groundswell of his support is out there and it's STILL strong and unwavering.


..........9000, hardly huge, a really shitty backyard band could do that here. FAKE NEWS ... no HUGE crowds!
.......... Forgot to mention the thousands of protestors too? Source: http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/Miami-Group-Organizing-Peaceful-Protest-to-Donald-Trumps-Presiden tial-Election-400841271.html includes video evidence.

The one that went around the world apologizing for the very existence of the United States and was ashamed of our nation was NOT a president. He was a dictator by the name of Obama. So it is true, no president did that, but America's first dictator, Obama, DID do that.

...........Names, places and ACTUAL words would make that FACTUAL, you again have none! FAKE NEWS!
.......... Just like some attack on SWEDEN ... what a knob is this 'President'! Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/19/world/europe/last-night-in-sweden-trumps-remark-baffles-a-nation. html?_r=0 Bowling Green, Atlanta, and now Sweden ... these guys invented fake news!

sex-spert said he has not lied then said. The Democrats had control of Congress during the Eisenhower administration. I have posted references (including the US Senate page) showing the Republicans controlled congress for 1 year of the Eisenhower administration. So your comment " The Democrats had control of Congress during the Eisenhower administration" is a PROVEN lie.