well responded
some things i believe we have to agree to disagree on though
the first point, i am willing to let it drop if you like, but i want to reitterate that saying in jest (or not in jest if you prefer, since you feel the joke was not much of a joke) that the world hates america does not in any way justify linking me to any kind of nazi. you accused me of being deliberately inflammitory with my propaganda comment....how can you possibly justify something like that? i'm sure you know full well that being linked in any way to the nazi beliefs or actions is about the most insulting AND inflammitory thing you can accuse somebody of. it disgusts people by its very nature. i may not like the way america carries itself in the international community, and i may not agree with all of the belief systems in place throughout your country, but i certainly don't burn, poison or torture americans. i do not ask for, or expect, any kind of apology from you (for that comment or any other you have made) but i think it is very very important that you understand that it is that very behavior which tends to create opinions like mine about your country and by extension, its people. when someone says "i hate canadians" we don;t say "you must be a nazi". and you can substitute any other nationailty and the result is the same (ummmm...maybe not jewish). really really think about that
nor do i expect you to apologize at all for the bush administration. i know that many many americans are embarassed by him, and i get no pleasure out of that (its not like we have never had a bonehead in charge here). and these issues are not bush specific. it is a sad fact that he seemed to exemplify a lot of them, but they existed before him and will exist after him. i think it was suggs who said that people will always have disagreements with other nations actions, and i think that is basically true. while it is a fact that canada has a better public image (for lack of a better term) it by no means makes us perfect, i'm sure there are people out there who dislike some of our actions/beliefs. and the same can be said for every country on the planet i am sure.
and as for the power thing, again keep in mind i do not talk specifically about W. But my points are valid, if the leader of your country is not leading in a way your country wants to be lead, things can be changed. And make no mistake, if not for Hummergate, clinton would almost certainly have remained in office. he was enormously popular when he was elected, and i think is generally viewed as a decent president, particularly from an economic POV. there was no real reason for him to lose power that comes to mind, although feel free to throw down if you have something here. just because the senate voted (narrowly) not to convict him, doesn't mean it didn't slow him down.
our system here is both similar and different. we have 3 major parties here, as well as various independants and the always amusing (and exponentially expanding lately) Green party. it does create a different dynamic than your two party system of course. unfortunately, as in the US, independants rarely have an impact on anything, which i think is a real shame because as you already said, it basically leaves you with a choice between the 3 majors, or the Greens. But for whatever reason, people rarely cast a vote for an independant. however, unlike in the US, here in Canada a minority government can be overthrown, and occasionally this is excersised. For example, right now our Conservative Party is in power (the most total seats). However, they do not posses 50% or more of the seats, meaning that the other two parties together can (in nontechnical terms

) say 'fuck this, you guys are idiots, we're done here' and force an election. they can basically say 'we represent, combined, the majority of canadians and we feel your actions are outside of their interests'. this tactic rarely serves to change the power structure (at least in my lifetime) but what it can do is force the government to watch itself very very carefully. the threat of a non confidence vote is often enough to derail whatever boneheaded scheme is in question. and the threat of this is in my opinion, the real value. actually forcing an election as i said rarely works and it does tend to piss people off if abused, but like i said, the threat is more often than not enough.
i don't know enough about american politics to know if any system like this would exist there, but if enough people bitch, something almost always happens, that i know for certain. voting mr obama in was (again in my opinion) a great thing. but elections are not the only way to force a change if a system is failing its people. and like i said, this isn't about the bush admin specifically. the point i am trying to make is, whoever leads you, their actions will reflect on your country and its people on an international level, and if you disagree with what is being done, the onus is on you to make it known and (if the majority of people agree with you at least) make it stop. saying you disagreed in retrospect might make you feel better but it won't change the international communities opinions. you and I don't live in an iraq-under-saddam type situation where we can say "thank god he's gone, we hated that shit" and hold our heads high. we live in democratic, free countries and we have the power to change what is being done. if we choose not to, we are as much at fault as the people doing it. nobody is going to shoot you for standing up and saying "this is wrong".
i also will add something i have not said before. while i detest the way america has carried itself in the past, i do not belittle every single thing the country has done. america has done a lot of good in the world, like many other influential nations. and I am certain that more good than harm has been done. to me it is the attitude of America (as a whole) that casues my dislike, not so much the actions. I don't agree with everything America has done, but there are many things I do believe were right. we won't touch on specifics in either case, because that has no bearing here. my dislike of america, believe it or not, does not stem from americas feeling that it needs to police the world, but more from the way that (be it in trade, immigration policy, environmental policy etc etc etc) america constantly feels the need to give the rest of the world the finger, basically because like a childhood bully, they feel being the biggest and most aggresive makes them right.
i have to leave now, so pea!
and give me something good to answer when i get back
cheers